What next for REDD+ following Doha disappointment?


What next for REDD+ following Doha disappointment?

Tierney Smith/RTCC.org – updated on 13 December 2012, 7:36 pm

Efforts to promote REDD+ as the main mechanism to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation are still on track, according to experts RTCC has spoken to, despite negotiations collapsing at the recent UN climate talks.

Brazil is understood to have objected to calls from international donors such as Norway for an international verification system of emissions reductions for REDD+, leading to the suspension of discussions in Doha.

While this did not knock Kyoto off the headlines, it was a major blow as deforestation generates 15-20% of global emissions.

Launched in 2008, the REDD+ scheme has always had the full backing of most parties, both developed and developing, and has less of the polarised positions that have plagued some of the more contentious negotiations.

“What is different about REDD is that it was proposed by developing countries,” Emily Brickell, a research officer at the Overseas Development Institute told RTCC. “It was a group of developing countries saying ‘look, this is what we can bring to the table.”

“In other negotiating tracks you often have the developed world asking for the developing world to do more, or the developing world demanding more from the developed world. REDD has a different feel to it, which is why it has traditionally moved on more constructively in negotiations.”

What went wrong?

REED+ was discussed in the first week of the negotiations when the UNFCCC’s technical advisory body met. While some issues were signed off an overall agreement could not be reached.

The crucial issue was around the measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) and monitoring of carbon stocks in forests.

The division was reported to be between Brazil, one of the potential beneficiaries of the REDD+ programme, and Norway, the largest funders of tropical forest conservation.

“I don’t think these were the only countries,” said Brickell. “These were the two that were digging their heels in the most but I think there were other countries that were hiding behind them.”

For example, the Coalition of Rainforest Nations (CfRN) and Papua New Guinea put their weight behind Brazil’s position, rejecting an international verification process to monitor emissions reduction.

Norway, which has spent almost $1bn to support the development of REDD+, pushed for an independent, international process to be undertaken by experts to ensure the verification of deforestation-related emissions reductions.

Brazil and other developing nations said they were unwilling to commit to such an external process and would prefer to monitor their own emissions.

Unable to agree on the issue of verification, the talks were pushed back another year leaving many countries frustrated.

In a blog post Matt Leggett, Head of the Policy at the Global Canopy Programme said: “The arguments have certainly tarnished Brazil’s reputation as the world leader on tackling deforestation, and have left delegates and observers angry with their tactics.”

What does this mean for the scheme?

Discussions will resume in the UNFCCC intersessional meeting in Bonn next May, with any decision now delayed to COP19 in Poland next November.

Josh Roberts, a Lawyer from ClientEarth told RTCC that we will have to wait to see how COP18′s text row will impact the process.

“I think we will start to see the implications as the discussions continue in Bonn,” he said. “There will probably be some back and forth talks between the parties concerned. They won’t want to spend a lot of time on the issue as they spend so much time on it in Doha.”

Brickell believes that the postponement of a decision in no way signals the end of the scheme.

“One negotiator told me that even though no decision was made, some progress has been made,” said Brickell. “They at least now have a draft text that they can work off, they are not having to start with a blank canvas.

“I don’t think in terms of momentum and the activity; that won’t be affected.”

Bruce Cabarle, Director of WWF’s Forest and Climate Initiative explained how the talks could progress over the coming year.

“REDD+ will continue to move forward, and perhaps even gain some momentum, despite the incremental progress coming out of Doha,” he said. “For example, Brazil continues to make significant progress at home with reducing deforestation and associated emissions from the Amazon even though they took a hard line during the REDD+ negotiations in Doha.”

Many countries are still coming out in support of REDD+. The UK, Norway, US, Germany and Australia issued a joint statement in Doha reinforcing their commitment to the scheme.

Bilateral partnerships are supporting REDD+ projects at local levels. Despite their row, last week Norway announced it would deposit another $180 million into Brazil’s Amazon Fund after the country reported a third annual drop in deforestation.

Roberts stresses that as the talks turn from the overall principles of the mechanism to the “nuts and bolts of it, we should expect that it will move a little slower.”

While in the interim period countries will continue to work on the scheme as they have been, without an agreement, a first for the negotiations, there is still a certain amount of guessing about where action on deforestation moves from here.

“No one really knows [where we stand] – we’re breaking new ground really,” said Leggett. “Our emphasis and the general momentum of many observers is to start moving the debate beyond the UNFCCC negotiations on REDD+ to try and tackle the broader questions related to drivers of deforestation.”

The drivers of deforestation were another contentious issue postponed to discussions at COP19, and Leggett stresses that cutting the demand for unsustainable commodities will need to be dealt with next year.

Symptoms of a wider debate

Ultimately the REDD+ discussions are part of a wider process, and the divide between developed and the developing world surfaces in negotiations.

Developing countries are concerned that limiting their use of forestry could hamper their development opportunities – a similar argument that is used in many of the negotiation tracks.

And like so many other issues under the UNFCCC, the REDD+ scheme depends on reliable and sufficient funding from the developed world.

Without this, the incentive to conserve forests will simply not be there.

“It actually surprises me that developing countries are not losing interest,” said Brickell. “They are being asked to shift their development paradigm and yet they are not sure they are going to have the money on the table a couple of years down the line.”

Following a disappointing two weeks on finance, countries must now come up with a framework to scale climate finance up to the $100 billion a year by 2020, pledged at Copenhagen in 2009.

“The finance of REDD+ is tied into the larger discussions on finance, which anyone who follows the negotiations knows are moving very slowly,” said Roberts. “A lot of this is not the fault of the particular parties; it is the economic and political climate at the moment.

“It is not easy to commit to large amounts of money when you are facing economic issues at home. The Parties also need to come to an agreement over increased mitigation ambition, especially for developed country Parties. So far, little progress has been made on this.”

He added that negotiators could move as far forward as they want on the REDD+ discussions but unless progress is made on a global climate deal, there would be nothing for the scheme to feed into.

“We knew going into Doha that most of the low hanging fruit with REDD+ had been harvested already,” said Carbarle.

“Progress to date on REDD+ has outpaced perhaps all other tracks of the complex UNFCCC negotiation. Future progress on REDD+ will now be much more dependent upon the progress on key issues within the overall UNFCCC negotiations.”

source: Responding To Climate Change



Leave a comment

COP18 Doha_republika.co.id
Sumber Photo: republika.co.id

GAMBARAN UMUM HASIL COP 18 UNFCCC di DOHA Desember 2012 (Doha Climate Gateway/DCG)


REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, DOHA – Konferensi Perubahan Iklim ke-18 di Doha, Qatar, ditutup pada Sabtu (8/12) pada pukul pukul 20.00 waktu setempat, setelah melalui negosiasi dan lobi-lobi para pihak pada hari sebelumnya.

Presiden COP18/CMP8, Abdullah bin Hamad Al-Attiyah, menutup konferensi dengan beberapa keputusan penting.

Di antaranya mengenai kelanjutan Protokol Kyoto periode komitmen kedua,pengurangan emisi dengan ambisi yang lebih besar, serta pelaksanaan komitmen penyediaan pendanaan jangka panjang oleh negara maju untuk membantu negara berkembang melaksanakan mitigasi dan adaptasi perubahan iklim.

Keputusan yang tertuang dalam “Doha Climate Gateway” (DCG) tersebut tidak sepenuhnya memuaskan bagi Indonesia dan negara-negara berkembang lain, khususnya mengenai komitmen pengurangan emisi dan penyediaan pendanaan oleh negara maju.

Mengenai keberlanjutan Protokol Kyoto, sebanyak 37 negara maju dan Uni Eropa telah menyepakati pelaksanaan periode komitmen kedua (Second Commitment Period) selama 8 tahun terhitung sejak tanggal 1 Januari 2013. Negara-negara tersebut merepresentasikan kurang dari 20 persen emisi gas rumah kaca dunia.

Sedangkan tiga negara maju yaitu Rusia, Jepang dan Selandia Baru memutuskan untuk tetap menjadi anggota (negara pihak) Protokol Kyoto, namun tidak memiliki komitmen penurunan emisi. Sementara itu, Kanada bergabung dengan Amerika Serikat yang memutuskan untuk keluar dari Protokol Kyoto.

Menanggapi hasil keputusan Doha tersebut, Ketua Delegasi RI, Rachmat Witoelar, mengatakan Indonesia meminta negara maju menunjukkan kepemimpinannya dalam upaya pengurangan emisi.

“Amerika Serikat, Kanada, Jepang, Rusia dan Selandia Baru diharapkan dapat membuat komitmen yang berimbang di dalam jalur lain di bawah konvensi perubahan iklim PBB,” kata Rachmat, dalam rilis yang dikirimkan kepada ROL, Senin (10/12).

Terkait pendanaan, negara maju hanya dapat menyetujui keputusan yang sifatnya “qualitative reassurance”, yaitu meyakinkan kembali bahwa mereka akan melaksanakan komitmen penyediaan pendanaan jangka panjang (long-term finance) yang dibuat di Copenhagen, Denmark pada COP15 tahun 2009.

Pada saat itu, negara maju berkomitmen untuk memobilisasi dana sejumlah 100 miliar dolar AS sampai tahun 2020 dengan catatan negara berkembang melakukan aksi mitigasi dan melaporkannya secara transparan.

Di Doha, negara berkembang meminta agar penyaluran pendanaan jangka panjang tersebut dimulai dengan kerangka tiga tahun (2013-2015), atau diistilahkan mid-term financing, dengan nilai dana 60 miliar dolar AS.

Angka konkret tersebut sangat diperlukan agar negara berkembang memiliki kepastian mengenai pendanaan yang tersedia untuk membantu mereka, khususnya mengenai komitmen pengurangan emisi dan penyediaan pendanaan oleh negara maju kepada negara berkembang untuk meningkatkan kegiatan adaptasi dan mitigasi perubahan iklim.

Enggannya negara maju untuk mendorong pembentukan mekanisme internasional //Loss and Damage menjadi hambatan dalam mempercepat aktivitas menekan dampak loss and damage akibat perubahan iklim.

Namun demikian, Indonesia melihat potensi dari diselesaikannya rencana kerja Komite Adaptasi sebagai peluang untuk dimanfaatkan sebagai langkah memperkuat adaptasi dan rencana aksi adaptasi di negara-negara rentan.

Tambahan dari TBU-S:
Catatan Analisis Hasil COP 18 UNFCCC di Doha versi Greenpeace klik disini

Rambu-rambu dalam REDD+

Leave a comment

Rambu-rambu yang Harus Diperhatikan dalam REDD+
Iklim Karbon, 08 Maret 2011

Proyek pengurangan emisi karbon dari deforestasi dan degradasi hutan (REDD+) di Indonesia perlu berfokus pada isu perbaikan birokrasi pemerintah, keadilan, serta kemanusiaan. Tanpa itu, kemiskinan akan terus melanda masyarakat di sekitar hutan. Hal ini disampaikan Manajer Program Hutan dan Iklim Indonesian Center for Environmental Law (ICEL) Giorgio Budi Indrarto menyusul konflik yang terjadi dalam pelaksanaan proyek percontohan REDD+ di Jambi dan Kalimantan Tengah.

”Kasus di Jambi dan Kalimantan Tengah bisa jadi soal kebijakan atau orangnya. Namun, ini menunjukkan ada banyak masalah di proyek REDD+,” ujar Giorgio, seperti yang dilansir Kompas.

Menurut keterangan yang disampaikan Koordinator Program Perubahan Iklim HuMa Bernadinus Steni, selama ini kebijakan pembangunan pemerintah cenderung gagal memberi nilai lebih kepada masyarakat sekitar hutan, sebaliknya, memiskinkan mereka. Masyarakat yang bermukin di sekitar hutan ‘dipaksa’ mencari jalan sendiri dan mengubah budaya mereka sejalan dengan pembatasan akses terhadap hutan.

Menurut Steni, ada tiga rambu yang harus diperhatikan pemerintah dan pengelola sektor kehutanan:
Pertama (I), kajian strategi pengelolaan lingkungan hidup pada tahap awal proyek.
Kedua (II), tidak ada perubahan fungsi ekologis di kawasan yang memiliki kerentanan dan keunikan hidrologi, sumber air bersih, struktur tanah, dan keanekaragaman hayati.
Ketiga (III), proyek itu harus menjamin pemenuhan hak-hak dasar masyarakat sebelum, selama, dan sesudah pelaksanaannya.

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: